Anchoring unsustainable practices in rhetoric

A study of just in time arrival of tanker ships

  • Hanna Varvne Gothenburg Research Institute, School of Business, Economics and Law, University of Gothenburg
Keywords: Rhetorical institutionalism, rhetoric strategies, rhetoric structures, Shipping, just-in-time

Abstract

In this paper, rhetorical institutionalism is used to increase the understanding of how sustainable practices become legitimized. The rhetoric strategies and rhetoric structures are analyzed to show how the way we talk can constrains change and implementation of sustainable practices by investigating the following research question: What are the rhetoric strategies and structures in organizations that enable or hinder change to sustainable practices? The paper draw from an interview study of tanker ships’ arrival to port and the possibility to change the practice towards just-in time arrival. The findings of this study shows that different rhetorical structures exist side by side in periods of change. Further, it indicate that analysis of rhetoric strategies and structures can indicate where change is happening. Which in turn can be used to guide measures initiated to increase change towards sustainable practices.

References

Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as Rhetoric: Knowledge‐intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies, 30(6), 997-1015. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00476.x
Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147. doi:10.2307/2095101
Greenwood, R., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms. The Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 27-48. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20785498
Harmon, D., Green Jr, S., & Goodnight, G. (2015). A model of rhetorical legitimation: the structure of communication and cognition underlying institutional maintenance and change. Academy Of Management Review, 40(1), 76-95. doi:10.5465/amr.2013.0310
Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an Organizational Practice by Subsidiaries of Multinational Corporations: Institutional and Relational Effects.(Statistical Data Included). Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 215. doi:10.2307/3069293
Patala, S., Korpivaara, I., Jalkala, A., Kuitunen, A., & Soppe, B. (2019). Legitimacy Under Institutional Change: How incumbents appropriate clean rhetoric for dirty technologies. Organization studies, 40(3), 395-419. doi:10.1177/0170840617736938
Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy. 50(1), 35-67. doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
Vaara, E., Tienari, J., & Laurila, J. (2006). Pulp and Paper Fiction: On the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring. Organization studies, 27(6), 789-813. doi:10.1177/0170840606061071
Published
2022-08-09
Section
10.1 Organizing sustainability: idle talk, niche, for real, impossible, or else?